☰
CD74HC112E
CD74HC112E
Active
Description:  IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16DIP
Manufacturer:  Texas Instruments
Datasheet:   CD74HC112E Datasheet
History Price: $0.78000
In Stock: 46900
CD74HC112E Specification
Specification
Mfr Part
CD74HC112E
Category
Logic - Flip Flops
Manufacturer
Texas Instruments
Series
74HC
Packaging
Tube
Status
Active
Environmental Compliance
Lead Free
Radiation Hardening
No
REACH SVHC
No SVHC
RoHS
Compliant
HS Code
-
Technical Parameter
Function
Set(Preset) and Reset
Type
JK Type
Output Type
Complementary
Number of Elements
2
Number of Bits per Element
1
Clock Frequency
60 MHz
Max Propagation Delay @ V, Max CL
30ns @ 6V, 50pF
Trigger Type
Negative Edge
Current - Output High, Low
5.2mA, 5.2mA
Voltage - Supply
2V ~ 6V
Current - Quiescent (Iq)
4 μA
Input Capacitance
10 pF
Operating Temperature
-55 ℃ ~ 125 ℃ (TA)
Mounting Type
Through Hole
Supplier Device Package
16-PDIP
Package / Case
16-DIP (0.300", 7.62mm)
CD74HC112E Compare Parts
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74LPT16374AMT
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT74MTE4
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT74MT
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT74ME4
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT74M96G4
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT74M96
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT74M96
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT74M
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT74EX
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT74E
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT73M96
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT73M
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT73M
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT73EG4
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT73E
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574QPWRQ1
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574QPWRG4Q1
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574QPWREP
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574QM96Q1
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574QM96G4Q1
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574QM96EP
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574PWR
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574ME4
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574M96G4
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574M96
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574M96
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574M
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574M
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT574E
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT564MG4
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT564M
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT564E
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT564E
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT534M96
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT534E
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT534E
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT377MS2075
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT377ME4
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT377M96
  • CD74HC112E vs CD74HCT377M
  • CD74HC112E Related Parts
    CD74AC109E
    CD74AC109E
    Harris Corporation
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16DIP
    CD74AC109E
    CD74AC109E
    Texas Instruments
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16DIP
    CD74AC109M
    CD74AC109M
    Harris Corporation
    DUAL J-K FLIP-FLOP
    CD74AC109M96
    CD74AC109M96
    Texas Instruments
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16SOIC
    CD74AC109M96
    CD74AC109M96
    Harris Corporation
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16SOIC
    CD74AC112E
    CD74AC112E
    Harris Corporation
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16DIP
    CD74AC112E
    CD74AC112E
    Texas Instruments
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16DIP
    CD74AC112M
    CD74AC112M
    Texas Instruments
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16SOIC
    CD74AC112M
    CD74AC112M
    Harris Corporation
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16SOIC
    CD74AC112M96
    CD74AC112M96
    Texas Instruments
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16SOIC
    CD74AC112M96G4
    CD74AC112M96G4
    Texas Instruments
    IC FF JK TYPE DUAL 1BIT 16SOIC
    CD74AC174E
    CD74AC174E
    Harris Corporation
    IC FF D-TYPE SNGL 6BIT 16DIP
    Customer Reviews
    4.95 out of 5.00 stars from 116 customer reviews from all over the world
    Luca Schwarz
    Germany
    5 stars
    2026-10-23 01:35
    Perfect, thank you.
    Antonin Bertrand
    France
    5 stars
    2026-10-23 01:15
    In line with my expectations
    Thank you
    Angela Carter
    United States
    5 stars
    2026-10-22 23:45
    Excellent description, fast shipping thank you
    Stanisław Jankowski
    Poland
    5 stars
    2026-10-22 23:40
    Fast shipping, memory not yet checked.
    Fleur van der Vlist
    Netherlands
    5 stars
    2026-10-22 22:21
    By taking away the Duge of shvidko. My daughter.
    Valeria Carolina
    Spain
    5 stars
    2026-10-22 21:41
    I was going to use them for a badge. In the end they are not tested. I imagine they work perfectly