☰
CDV19FF751JO3
CDV19FF751JO3
Active
Description:  CAP MICA 750PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
History Price: $4.5298
In Stock: 29400
CDV19FF751JO3 Specification
Specification
Mfr Part
CDV19FF751JO3
Category
Mica and PTFE Capacitors
Manufacturer
Cornell Dubilier Electronics
Series
CDV19
Packaging
Bulk
Status
Active
Environmental Compliance
Lead Free
Radiation Hardening
No
REACH SVHC
No SVHC
RoHS
Compliant
HS Code
-
Technical Parameter
Capacitance
750 pF
Tolerance
?%
Voltage - Rated
1 kV
Dielectric Material
Mica
Operating Temperature
-55℃ ~ 125℃
Mounting Type
Through Hole
Package / Case
Radial
Lead Spacing
0.343" (8.70mm)
Features
General Purpose
Size / Dimension
-
Height - Seated (Max)
-
CDV19FF751JO3 PDF Datasheet
CDV19FF751JO3 Compare Parts
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK910FO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK681JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK471FO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK391JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK302JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK272GO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK252FO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK241FO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK201JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK151JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK131JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FK112GO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ621GO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ471JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ471GO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ431JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ221JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ182JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ151FO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ122JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ112JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ111FO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FJ102GO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH822JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH821JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH621JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH561GO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH472FO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH221JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH162GO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH162FO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH161GO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH131GO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH122FO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH111JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH102JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH102JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FH101JO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FF751JO3F
  • CDV19FF751JO3 vs CDV30FF682FO3
  • CDV19FF751JO3 Related Parts
    CDV16FF101JO3
    CDV16FF101JO3
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 100PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF101JO3F
    CDV16FF101JO3F
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 100PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF102JO3
    CDV16FF102JO3
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 1000PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF102JO3F
    CDV16FF102JO3F
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 1000PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF121JO3
    CDV16FF121JO3
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 120PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF121JO3F
    CDV16FF121JO3F
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 120PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF122JO3
    CDV16FF122JO3
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 1200PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF122JO3F
    CDV16FF122JO3F
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 1200PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF131JO3
    CDV16FF131JO3
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 130PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF131JO3F
    CDV16FF131JO3F
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 130PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF132JO3
    CDV16FF132JO3
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 1300PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    CDV16FF132JO3F
    CDV16FF132JO3F
    Cornell Dubilier Electronics
    CAP MICA 1300PF 5% 1KV RADIAL
    Customer Reviews
    4.95 out of 5.00 stars from 131 customer reviews from all over the world
    Paolo Marino
    Italy
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 20:00
    It all seems OK
    Linda Wilson
    United Kingdom
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:51
    Great item, great seller, A +++ +++ +
    Chloé Leroy
    France
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:50
    C is good
    Ubirajara Lima Júnior
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:45
    Good quality, as always have a lose
    Patrícia Lima Almeida
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:42
    First Quality product I recommend the fan
    Zé Maria Ferreira
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:25
    I haven't tested it yet, but it got right