☰
CA-RTPNFBA004
CA-RTPNFBA004
Active
Description:  COAX CBL RP-TNC TO N-TYPE
Manufacturer:  L-com
History Price: $38.65
In Stock: 39200
CA-RTPNFBA004 Specification
Specification
Mfr Part
CA-RTPNFBA004
Category
Coaxial Cables (RF)
Manufacturer
L-com
Series
-
Packaging
Bag
Status
Active
Environmental Compliance
Lead Free
Radiation Hardening
No
REACH SVHC
No SVHC
RoHS
Compliant
HS Code
-
Technical Parameter
Style
RP-TNC to N-Type
1st Connector
RP-TNC Plug
1st Contact Gender
Female
1st Connector Mounting Type
Free Hanging (In-Line)
1st Connector Mounting Feature
-
2nd Connector
N-Type Jack
2nd Contact Gender
Female
2nd Connector Mounting Type
Free Hanging (In-Line)
2nd Connector Mounting Feature
-
Length
48.0" (1.2m) 4.0'
Cable Type
LMR 195
Color
50 Ohms
Features
50 Ohms
Operating Temperature
Black
Ingress Protection
-
Cable Impedance
-
Connector Impedance
-
CA-RTPNFBA004 Compare Parts
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-WMNMA010
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-WMNMA004
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-WMNMA002
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-WMNFA020
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-WMNFA010
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-WMNFA004
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-WMNFA002
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-UFLSBQC20
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-UFLRSBQC20
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-UFLQC20
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-UFLQ010
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-UFLNMQC20
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-UFLNBQC20
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR050
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR025
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR020
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR015
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR012
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR010
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR007
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR006
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR005
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR004
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR003
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR002
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBPR-PR001
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR050
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR025
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR020
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR015
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR012
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR010
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR007
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR006
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR005
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR004
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR003
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR002
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-PR001
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 vs CA-TRBP-P050
  • CA-RTPNFBA004 Related Parts
    CA-085FNMNF006
    CA-085FNMNF006
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMNF012
    CA-085FNMNF012
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMNF018
    CA-085FNMNF018
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMNF024
    CA-085FNMNF024
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMNF036
    CA-085FNMNF036
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMNM006
    CA-085FNMNM006
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMNM012
    CA-085FNMNM012
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMNM018
    CA-085FNMNM018
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMNM024
    CA-085FNMNM024
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMNM036
    CA-085FNMNM036
    L-com
    COAX CBL N-TYPE TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMSM006
    CA-085FNMSM006
    L-com
    COAX CBL SMA TO N-TYPE
    CA-085FNMSM012
    CA-085FNMSM012
    L-com
    COAX CBL SMA TO N-TYPE
    Customer Reviews
    4.95 out of 5.00 stars from 106 customer reviews from all over the world
    Lily Ramirez
    United States
    5 stars
    2026-10-15 13:58
    looks ok , not used yet
    Nélson Andrade Ferreira
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-10-15 13:09
    Working perfectly is original!!!!
    Zilda
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-10-15 09:54
    Beautiful! But I haven't used any yet.
    Nathaniel Parker
    United States
    5 stars
    2026-10-15 09:21
    A component tester verified all 10 BD912 transistors were OK with an hFE ranging from 141 to 157. Shipment to the US was very fast.
    Sophia Turner
    United States
    5 stars
    2026-10-15 09:16
    A component tester verified all 10 BD911 transistors were OK with an hFE ranging from 44 to 47. Shipment to the US was very fast.
    Flávia Costa Neto
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-10-15 09:01
    it could be better with a suitable package instead of a simple plastic bag..