☰
6ES79240CA200BC0
6ES79240CA200BC0
Active
Description:  TP3 PUSH-IN W/LED, 8 I/O
Manufacturer:  Siemens
History Price: Active
In Stock: 600
6ES79240CA200BC0 Specification
Specification
Mfr Part
6ES79240CA200BC0
Category
Rectangular Cable Assemblies
Manufacturer
Siemens
Series
*
Packaging
Box
Status
Active
Environmental Compliance
Lead Free
Radiation Hardening
No
REACH SVHC
No SVHC
RoHS
Compliant
HS Code
-
Technical Parameter
Connector Type
-
Number of Positions
-
Number of Rows
-
Pitch - Connector
-
Pitch - Cable
-
Length
-
Features
-
Color
-
Shielding
-
Usage
-
Cable Termination
-
Contact Finish
-
Contact Finish Thickness
-
6ES79240CA200BC0 Compare Parts
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79281AA204AA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242CC200AC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242CC200AA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242CA200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242CA200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242CA200AC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242CA200AA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242AM200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242AM200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242AK200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242AA200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242AA200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242AA200AC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79242AA200AA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CL200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CL200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CH200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CH200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CC210AC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CC210AA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CC200AC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CA200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CA200AC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240CA200AA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240BG200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240BG200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240BF200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240BE200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240BE200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240BD200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240BD200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240BB200AC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240BB200AA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240AA200BC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240AA200BA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240AA200AC0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79240AA200AA0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79235CB000DB0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79235CB000CB0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 vs 6ES79235BJ000DB0
  • 6ES79240CA200BC0 Related Parts
    6ES79213AA000AA0
    6ES79213AA000AA0
    Siemens
    CONNECTOR FRONT W/CBL S7300 16DI
    6ES79213AA200AA0
    6ES79213AA200AA0
    Siemens
    CONNECTOR FRONT W/CBL S7300 32DI
    6ES79213AB000AA0
    6ES79213AB000AA0
    Siemens
    CONNECTOR FRONT W/CBL S7300 16DI
    6ES79213AB200AA0
    6ES79213AB200AA0
    Siemens
    CONNECTOR FRONT W/CBL S7300 32DI
    6ES79213AC000AA0
    6ES79213AC000AA0
    Siemens
    CONNECTOR FRONT W/CBL 2A-DIG,SPR
    6ES79213AD000AA0
    6ES79213AD000AA0
    Siemens
    CONNECTOR FRONT W/CBL S7300 2 AO
    6ES79213AF000AA0
    6ES79213AF000AA0
    Siemens
    MODULE PLUGIN W/CBL S7300 ANALOG
    6ES79213AF200AA0
    6ES79213AF200AA0
    Siemens
    FRNT CONN W/ TWISTED RIBBONCBL A
    6ES79213AG200AA0
    6ES79213AG200AA0
    Siemens
    FRONT CONNECTOR W/ TWISTED RIBBO
    6ES79213AH201AA0
    6ES79213AH201AA0
    Siemens
    FRONT CONNECTOR S7-300 40 POLE C
    6ES79213AK200AA0
    6ES79213AK200AA0
    Siemens
    FRONT CONNECTOR W/ TWISTED RIBBO
    6ES79215AB200AA0
    6ES79215AB200AA0
    Siemens
    FRONT CONN. MOD. (DIGI. 4X8E/A)
    Customer Reviews
    4.95 out of 5.00 stars from 151 customer reviews from all over the world
    Paolo Marino
    Italy
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 20:00
    It all seems OK
    Linda Wilson
    United Kingdom
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:51
    Great item, great seller, A +++ +++ +
    Chloé Leroy
    France
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:50
    C is good
    Ubirajara Lima Júnior
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:45
    Good quality, as always have a lose
    Patrícia Lima Almeida
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:42
    First Quality product I recommend the fan
    Zé Maria Ferreira
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-11-06 19:25
    I haven't tested it yet, but it got right